Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsAMP v. USPTO: Appellees' Brief
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Donald Zuhn -- In a brief filed on November 30, Plaintiffs-Appellees in Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office argue that they have standing; that Myriad's BRCA1/2 isolated DNA claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they cover laws of nature, natural phenomena, physical phenomena, and products of nature; that Myriad's process claims are invalid under § 101 because they cover laws of nature and abstract ideas; and that Myriad's claims are unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Plaintiffs-Appellees begin their brief by arguing that while "Myriad asserts that 'isolated' genes are so different that...Full post as published by Patent Docs on January 13, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

USPTO Warns Customers Regarding Unsolicited Third-Party Communications
Alabama: appellees' brief filed in Supreme Court in Riley v. Kennedy
TORTS (Premises liability); JUDICIAL ACMISSIONS: Faller v. Endicott-Mayflower, LLC (COA 11/20/2009)
USPTO Extends Comment Period For Deferred Examination







