ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> JAABlog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: JAABlogANOTHER INTERESTING ONE FROM THE 4TH
By JAABLOG
ADVERTISEMENTS
Even though they felt they had to affirm the trial judge's denial of a Motion To Suppress, the 4th DCA issued a strongly worded opinion today regarding situations "where ?consent? to a search is found under objectively questionable circumstances ... ". From Ruiz v. State, issued Wednesday:The ?totality of the circumstances? approach has expanded the concept of ?consent? in a way that has had a significant effect on the administration of criminal justice. It allows a trial court to rely on other factors that swallow aggressive police conduct and contract the limits of Fourth Amendment protection.In many cases, the police rely upon a defendant?s voluntary consent to justify a search or a stop. One possibility is that citizens, especially those involved in crimes, have a desire to cooperate with the police toavoid making waves...continue to full postFull post as published by JAABlog on January 12, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Interesting Question About Homestead Exemption In Bankruptcy
Another Interesting Writing Competition...
HEZBOLLAH IS INTERESTING IN THE WAY FREDDY KRUGER IS INTERESTING: Michael Ledeen has more on why sea
McCain v. Obama: October 20, Georgetown Law








