Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawOfficials serving without compensation to pay full cost of health insurance coverage
Formal Opinions of the Attorney General, 2007 - F1
The Attorney General has issued an opinion indicating that public authorities, whose board members are State Officers and which members, pursuant to statute, serve without salary or other compensation, may not pay for health insurance coverage for current or retired board members.
With respect to political subdivisions of the State paying employer contributions for health insurance on behalf of unpaid officers and employees, the Regulations of the President of the Civil Service Commission [4 NYCRR 73.1(c)(1)(ii)] provide, in pertinent part that:
?.any unpaid local elective official who occupies a position which by statute, local law, ordinance or resolution is expressly prohibited from receiving compensation or school board member electing to participate by reason of such membership shall be required to pay both the employer and the employee contribution for any coverage elected under the [New York State Health Insurance] plan ?
The President?s Regulations apply only to State officers and employees and the officers and employees of those political subdivisions of the State that are ?participating employers?* in the New York State Health Insurance Plan [NYSHIP].
In this regard, the Department of Civil Service has interpreted §167.2 of the Civil Service Law to permit uncompensated personnel of a public authority that is a participating employer to elect to participate in NYSHIP but bars the authority from making employer contributions for NYSHIP coverage on behalf of those serving without compensation.
Essentially, Opinion F-1 addresses the eligibility of ?State Officers? serving without compensation to have employer contributions to NYSHIP made on their behalf.
It is unclear whether the Opinion is intended to apply to a political subdivision of the State that is not a ?participating employer? in NYSHIP insofar as its officers and employees serving without compensation are concerned where such contributions are otherwise authorized by the jurisdiction involved.
* §163.4 of the Civil Service Law provides that: ?Any public authority, public benefit corporation, school district, special district, district corporation, municipal corporation, or other agency, subdivision or quasi-public organization of the state, whose employees and retired employees are authorized to be included in the plan as provided by subdivision two, may elect to participate in such plan.? Such entities are referred to as ?participating employers.?
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on January 10, 2011 (boomark / email).
Medicare
Guide to government health insurance for the elderly
Workers Compensation Overview
Federal laws that cover workplace injuries
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Health Coverage Canceled
Kaiser Permanente to pay $300,000 settlement in insurance lawsuit.
Wind and Hail Coverage
Allstate Corp. agrees to restore insurance coverage and pay $250,000 settlement.
Health Insurance
alleging health insurance companies have forced patients to pay more than they should when using doctors and hospitals outside their insurer's networks.
Insurance Practices
AIG pays nine states $12.5 million settlement related to producer compensation and insurance placement.
Oxford Health Insurance
$50 million refunds offered in overcharged insurance suit.
Worker's Compensation
Lockport to pay $278,220 settlement in insurance lawsuit.

Health Insurance Reform Mythbuster: Requiring Health Insurance is a Tax on Americans
New Health Law Brings Better Coverage For Women
Will Health Law Cut Company Coverage
Health Insurance Reform Mythbuster: Requiring Health Insurance is a New Tax on Families
Never criticize your husband's mashed potatoes








