Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyNinth Circuit Panel Holds That Mt. Soledad War Memorial Cross Violates Establishment Clause
By Eugene Volokh
The opinion is Trunk v. City of San Diego, just handed down today. This sort of litigation is of course nothing new, but I suspect that the decision will slightly increase the likelihood that the Justices will agree to reconsider the endorsement test under the Establishment Clause. This is especially so because of the recent Utah Highway Patrol memorial crosses case; I expect that the Utah case will be the likely vehicle for this, though if the Justices agree to hear it they?ll probably hold the Mt. Soledad case pending a decision in the Utah case.
Thanks to How Appealing for the pointer.
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on January 04, 2011 (boomark / email).
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Insignia
26-Inch Flat-Panel LCD TVs Recalled
Gulf War Syndrome
Panel Confirms it's Real, and Identifies Causes
Pull Vicodin, Percocet
Expert Panel Advises FDA

Latest Mt. Soledad Decision To Be Appealed
Establishment Clause Challenge To Mt. Soledad Cross In Federal Hands Is Rejected
9th Circuit: Mt. Soledad war memorial cross is unconstitutional
9th Circuit Holds that SORNA Prosecution Violates Ex Post Facto Clause (for Juveniles)
9th Circuit Hears Latest Appeal In Mt. Soledad Cross Case
9th Circuit Oral Arguments: In Mt. Soledad Cross Case







