Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Maryland Injury Lawyer BlogNew Expert Designations Opinion
Last week, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided Logan v. LSP Marketing, a lead paint case in Baltimore City.
In this case, Plaintiff did not answer discovery. Defense lawyers, who I believe were the Leder Law Group in D.C., filed a motion to compel. In what is regrettably a common practice in Maryland, the motion to compel got Plaintiff to answer the discovery and their response was "hey, this is moot, we answered now." Defendant's counsel, to their credit, wrote a reply saying the answers were insufficient in part because Plaintiff wrote garden variety broad designations of experts. The motion was granted but a more detailed expert designation never came.
So before trial, Defendant sought to strike the experts. Judge Kaye A. Allison struck Plaintiff's experts from testifying at trial. When the case went to trial, Judge John P. Miller denied the motion to reconsider Judge Allison's motion. Which left Plaintiff with no case and Judge Miller granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment.
Full post as published by Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog on January 03, 2011 (boomark / email).
Darvocet
FDA Expert Panel Votes for Ban
Pull Vicodin, Percocet
Expert Panel Advises FDA

Probate in Minnesota - Costs, Time Frame & Beneficiary Designations
Yet Another Opinion on the Law of Expert Testimony
Awards, Designations and Rankings for Legal Public Relations
Judge Disqualifies Expert for Lack of Impartiality
CLE on Beneficiary Designations
NASAA Announces New Model Rule on Senior Designations








