Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogTolson on Unconscious Discrimination
By Lawrence Solum
Franita Tolson has posted The Boundaries of Litigating Unconscious Discrimination: Firm-based Remedies in Response to a Hostile Judiciary on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
The notion that a corporation has a duty under Delaware law to create an environment amenable to diversity is an intriguing idea. Such an environment could address overt discrimination, but more importantly, discrimination that is unconscious or subtle, which is more prevalent. Unconscious discrimination is actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but scholars are in agreement that court regulation of it has failed. Contrary to the alternatives suggested in the literature, placing the burden on the firm to regulate discrimination ex ante is more likely to minimize unconscious, discriminatory behavior, at least moreso than tinkering with the ex post remedies available for those few violations that can be proven through Title VII. This article first explains why courts have failed to address unconscious discrimination, a failure that has emerged largely out of respect for employment at will and an unwillingness to infer differential treatment where other explanations are possible. Courts can address only the most extreme cases of unconscious discrimination, which require the presence of certain factors that will allow the court to isolate the unconscious bias. Second, this article proposes other mechanisms for addressing unconscious discrimination that account for its peculiar nature, mainly firm-based remedies that will be more successful than the courts have been in addressing this problem. The difficulty comes, however, in incentivizing firms to address unconscious discrimination without the impetus of litigation, and this article shows that such incentive can come from an unlikely blend of the duties of care and loyalty, corporate norms, and economic pressure from corporate giants like Wal-Mart.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on March 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Drive Through Discrimination
Jack-in-the Box pays undisclosed racial discrimination settlement to two customers.
Housing Buyer Discrimination
White homeowner settles $30,000 buyer-discrimination lawsuit.
American State Bank Discrimination
$225,000 settlement reached in hiring discrimination lawsuit.
Religious Discrimination
NMSU to pay $165,000 in Muslim discrimination settlement.
Age Discrimination Suit Settled for $8.75 Million
Age Discrimination Class Action Settled for $8.75 Million
Elderly Floridians Win Discrimination Class Action
Florida to Pay $27M Elderly Floridians Win Discrimination Class Action

Interpreting Delaware Corporate Law to Disincentivize Unconscious Discrimination
Recently Published Scholarship: Symposium on Unconscious Discrimination
Unconscious Situation of Choice
7th Cir.: Is Association Discrimination Disability Discrimination or Expense Discrimination
Florida: Man goes to strip club, found pantless and unconscious
Age Discrimination Protection-the ADEA









