Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Niches Blogs -> The Privacy and Security Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Niches
: The Privacy and Security Law BlogCalifornia Governor Vetoes Proposed Law Imposing Stronger Data Protection Requirements
Posted by Charlene Brownlee
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 779 -- legislation that would have amended California's data security breach legislation to impose stronger data protection requirements than the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
AB 779 would have prohibited businesses that sell goods or services to any resident of California and that accept as payment credit cards (and debit cards or other payment devices) from, among other things, storing, retaining, sending, or failing to limit access to payment-related data, and from storing sensitive authentication data subsequent to an authorization, unless a specified exception applied. Further, the bill would have made such businesses liable to the owner or licensee of the information for the reimbursement of costs of: (i) providing notice to consumers as required by existing data breach notification law; and (ii) card replacement as a result of the breach.
Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 779 based on objections to the broad scope of the law and the excessive cost and burden for compliance for small businesses. The Governor also deferred to industry regulation, noting in a veto statement that industry is better equipped than lawmakers to evaluate the need for higher standards.
Minnesota remains the only state which has, to date, codified or increased the compliance requirements of the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. Minnesota’s Plastic Card Security Act, effective August 1, 2007, amending Minnesota’s security breach notification law by, among other things, prohibiting businesses from retaining certain payment card data after authorization of a transaction.
Full post as published by The Privacy and Security Law Blog on October 18, 2007 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Proposed $20 Million Settlement
for Veterans' Data Theft Class Action
VA Data Theft Class Action
$20 Million Settlement Proposed
Darvon
Other Propoxyphene-Containing Meds to Require Stronger Warnings
T-mobile data plans, T-mobile, t-mobile phones
T-Mobile Faces Class Action over Limited Unlimited Data Plans
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement

Gov. Lingle releases list of potential vetoes
Three Family Leave Bills Vetoed By Governor
New Jersey Governor Vetoes Wrongful Death Law, Finding It Bad for State's Business
California governor vetoes Harvey Milk bill
Calif. gov's sweeping vetoes upsets plaintiffs bar
California Bar Exam Mac Requirements








