ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Illinois Injury Lawyer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Illinois Injury Lawyer Blog

Cook County medical malpractice lawsuit OK?d for negligence in DuPage

ADVERTISEMENTS

An interesting Chicago Daily Law Bulletin article addressed a recent First District Appellate Court affirmation regarding a denied motion to transfer an Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit. Justice Robert E. Gordon explained in the opinion that the interest in deciding controversies locally may not be as strong in a medical malpractice lawsuit as in other litigation because the jury pool in DuPage County may include people familiar with the physicians and hospitals in their small county. As a result, it could be more difficult to find 12 fair and impartial people in DuPage County compared with Cook County.

Additionally, Justice Gordon reasoned that the unfairness of imposing trial expense is really not a consideration when the two county court locations are a mere 32 miles apart. While the burden of jury duty on residents of a forum that has little connection to the litigation is always a consideration, the fact that the jury pool in DuPage County may include people more familiar with the medical providers makes that forum less of a consideration. Justice Gordon further expressed that the court dockets of both counties are similarly congested and the administrative difficulties of adding the case to either docket could have little or no effect. The distance between the two courthouses ? 32 miles ? was discussed explaining why the convenience of the parties should not be significant.

In affirming the denial of the defendant?s request to transfer the Illinois medical malpractice case, the First District Appellate Court highlighted Illinois Supreme Court jurisprudence. Justice Gordon also noted that the Illinois Supreme Court has held that the plaintiff has a substantial interest in choosing the forum where his rights will be vindicated and the plaintiff?s forum choice should rarely be disturbed unless the other factors strongly favor transfer.

Read more about the Appellate Court opinion at Chicago Daily Law Bulletin.

Full post as published by Illinois Injury Lawyer Blog on December 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0028 secs (from cache 11/02/26 23:03:24)