ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Education Law Blogs -> Edjurist

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Education Law

: Edjurist

Liveblogging AERA: Reigning in the Confusion over Parents Involved in Community Schools

By Justin Bathon

ADVERTISEMENTS
Earlier this week I posted on the developing confusion among some scholars concerning the decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools (apparently we are going to call it PICS, but with only 1 i, even though the real groups calls itself piics, as in piics.org). Well, that was before I hit the legal presentations, where there may be frustration, but there is more clarity. Perhaps it is just the more short term minded nature of the legal scholars who are typically concerned with the ?here and now? and not the ?might be someday,? but the legal scholars that presented on PICS had more clarity as to where the disputes now turn ? to classifications that implicate race, but may not be race itself. These scholars found clear evidence in Justice Kennedy?s opinion that if schools can come up with measures that are not race, but achieve the same goal, the courts will give deference to the schools.

I can see multiple factors being employed to get as close to race-based admissions decisions without specifically saying ?White,? ?Black,? ?Latino? ? you get the picture. All of these factors, even in combination may achieve exactly the same purpose but would be provided deference (and approved) because of the schools? effort to avoid the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights acts altogether. Even if these have a disparate impact against Whites, such policies will probably be upheld.

So, the race is on to find a multitude of factors that move the same children into the same places as before, only using a combination of other factors. The litigation will now turn to just how close can we get to race without actually touching it. Obviously SES is everyone?s first thought, but what about parental education level? What about privileging some locations within districts as an ?economic incentive??  And on and on. It is going to force us to figure out what exactly makes the minority experience unique in America and then privileging every one of those unique factors in combination to essentially use race as an admissions characteristic without actually using it. That is the current challenge laid out for legal scholars. Should be fun.

Full post as published by Edjurist on March 27, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)