ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Missouri Injury Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Missouri Injury Law Blog

Missouri Persoanl Injury Law - Evidence at Trial: Unrelated Medical Procedures or Conditions, are they admissible?

By Benjamin J. Sansone, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

As discussed in a previous post on Missouri Trial Evidence (Missouri Personal Injury Trial Evidence: Recreational Drinking and Drug Use) , personal injury lawyers need to make sure that they keep damaging evidence against their client, the injury victim, from being seen or heard by the jury so that the jury decides the injury lawsuit on relevant issues and not collateral issues that are not relevant to the injury claim.

As an experienced St Louis injury attorney, on such area I have seen that defense lawyers like to bring up in Missouri car accident cases and other injury related cases are unrelated medical conditions or procedures. Let's say the Plaintiff was hit by a drunk driver and broke their leg and injured their back, should the defense be allowed to introduce evidence that the Plaintiff also suffered a bout with cancer? The defense would want to do this to try and say the pain and suffering in the injured person's life is from the cancer and not the other injuries, an attempt to reduce legitimate injury money damages and the final personal injury verdict.

In Senter v. Ferguson, 486 SW 2d 644 (Mo Ct App ED 1972) the trial court allowed the defense to cross examine the Plaintiff regarding unrelated injuries from many years prior, the defense claimed this was to impeach the Plaintiff because she stated she was in "good health" prior to the accident. The appellate court reversed this Missouri personal injury case in part because of the use of Plaintiff prior medical conditions unrelated to her current condition.

The court stated "While we are dubious that this evidence, stretching as it did over a period of seventeen years and covering the ages of 43-60, served its purpose of impeachment, we could not sanction its admission even if it did serve the purpose. Irrelevant and immaterial evidence does not become admissible simply to impeach a witness "

Full post as published by Missouri Injury Law Blog on December 09, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0157 secs (new cache)