Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklylast edition in November
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
From the intro, as previously foreshadowed (pdf/html):
This edition looks at two recent cases addressing indigent defense, one capital, State v. Mata from Nebraska, and the other noncapital, Simmons v. State Public Defender from the Iowa Supreme Court.
John Wesley Hall, Jr., pegged Simmons when he noted it ?is a remarkable opinion worthy of being a brief law review article itself considering the NLADA and ABA standards, cases considering ‘takings’ of counsel?s time, counsel’s standing, and systemic ineffective assistance from a fee cap creating a disincentive for defense counsel to adequately perform in indigent criminal appeals.? Simmons has exceptionally good dicta, as well as a well thought analysis on fee caps & IAC, as well as the burden of proof in allegations regarding systemic failures in representing classes of people...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on November 29, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Book Review Monday: Building Biotechnology 3d Edition
Today in Presidential History: Wartime Holiday Edition
Today in Presidential History: Conspiracy Edition








