ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Caveat Emptor

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: Caveat Emptor

Force-Placed Insurance: Another Mortgage Servicer Ripoff

By Sam Glover

ADVERTISEMENTS

http://flic.kr/p/4zs2yu

Force-placed insurance is an insurance policy your mortgage service picks out when your homeowners insurance policy expires. It can cost up to ten times more than a regular homeowners policy, in part because mortgage servicers are often getting kickbacks and other incentives due to self-dealing.

American Banker suggests that force-placed insurance may be a far larger problem—for investors and borrowers—than the robo-signing that recently came to light. Borrowers lose out because their mortgage payments become impossible to pay, and investors lose out because force-placed insurance drives more loans into default. Mortgage services and force-placed insurance providers, however, get what Diane Thompson of the National Consumer Law Center calls a “gravy train” from commissions and reinsurance schemes.

As with the near-complete failure of the mortgage modification effort, the problem seems to lie in the screwed-up incentives that mortgage servicers enjoy. They seem to make more money when everyone else—banks, investors, and borrowers—are losing out.

In this case, mortgage servicers claim they are only doing what they are told—investor contracts usually require homeowners insurance for mortgaged properties. As American Banker points out, force-placed insurance is not inherently objectionable, it is the self dealing and consequent lack of competition the is the problem. Investor contracts don’t require ridiculous, backdated, overpriced policies; but mortgage services like just such policies, which line the servicers’ pockets at the expense of investors and borrowers.

The Dodd-Frank Act should have eliminated this sort of thing, but according to Felix Salmon, nobody knows who is supposed to enforce it in the case of force-placed insurance. So it goes on.

(Thanks, Consumerist!)

Related posts:

Full post as published by Caveat Emptor on December 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0189 secs (new cache)