Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Caveat Emptor
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: Caveat EmptorForce-Placed Insurance: Another Mortgage Servicer Ripoff
By Sam Glover
http://flic.kr/p/4zs2yu
Force-placed insurance is an insurance policy your mortgage service picks out when your homeowners insurance policy expires. It can cost up to ten times more than a regular homeowners policy, in part because mortgage servicers are often getting kickbacks and other incentives due to self-dealing.
American Banker suggests that force-placed insurance may be a far larger problem—for investors and borrowers—than the robo-signing that recently came to light. Borrowers lose out because their mortgage payments become impossible to pay, and investors lose out because force-placed insurance drives more loans into default. Mortgage services and force-placed insurance providers, however, get what Diane Thompson of the National Consumer Law Center calls a “gravy train” from commissions and reinsurance schemes.
As with the near-complete failure of the mortgage modification effort, the problem seems to lie in the screwed-up incentives that mortgage servicers enjoy. They seem to make more money when everyone else—banks, investors, and borrowers—are losing out.
In this case, mortgage servicers claim they are only doing what they are told—investor contracts usually require homeowners insurance for mortgaged properties. As American Banker points out, force-placed insurance is not inherently objectionable, it is the self dealing and consequent lack of competition the is the problem. Investor contracts don’t require ridiculous, backdated, overpriced policies; but mortgage services like just such policies, which line the servicers’ pockets at the expense of investors and borrowers.
The Dodd-Frank Act should have eliminated this sort of thing, but according to Felix Salmon, nobody knows who is supposed to enforce it in the case of force-placed insurance. So it goes on.
Related posts:
- HUD Goes After Housing Insurance Companies for Discrimination
The Department of Housing and Urban Development has charged Erie... - Auto Insurance Consumers are Shopping Around
According to Progressive CEO Glenn M. Renwick, “[t]here is a... - California Foreclosure Law Passed
“The thrust of the law is to require mortgage servicers...
Full post as published by Caveat Emptor on December 06, 2010 (boomark / email).
Whats a Home Loan Modification?
How to Qualify for a Home Loan Modification
Self Defense
It's legal to defend yourself and your family
Home Mortgages
What to look for
Medicare
Guide to government health insurance for the elderly
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
National City Mortgage
$4.6 million payout resolves mortgage suit.
SunTrust Mortgage Faces Class Action over Alleged HAMP Breach of Contract
SunTrust Mortgage Faces Class Action over Mortgage Restructuring
Excessive Force
Washtenaw County pays family $4 million wrongful death settlement.
LINA - Cigna Life Insurance Company of North America Disability Claims
LINA Insurance alleging violations of disability insurance claims.
AARP Insurance
alleging misleading medical insurance policies.
Oxford Health Insurance
$50 million refunds offered in overcharged insurance suit.

Attention Abused Homeowners: Please contact the FTC and report your mortgage servicer
Mortgage Servicer Foreclosure Fraud
What Are Those Fees Added To My Mortgage
How Much is Mortgage Insurance
U.S. Subprime Servicer Advances Down to 63%, 88% for Alt-A
Force Placed Insurance Only Protects The Lender









