Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bankruptcy

: Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog

The Long Version of Why I Hate Reaffirmations, Written by a Smart Bankruptcy Professor!

By Joseph McDaniel, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

A smart bankruptcy professor has written a smart article about the inherent conflicts associated with reaffirmations. If you take the time to read it, you will understand why many experienced Arizona Bankruptcy Attorneys like reaffirmations in the same way that we like plutonium in our orange juice.

He asked me to link to that article, and I was delighted to oblige. So here's the link, Gregory!

And below you'll find an abstract of the article, just for flavor:

Divided Loyalties: The Attorney?s Role in Bankruptcy Reaffirmations

Gregory M. Duhl
William Mitchell College of Law

American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 101-167, 2010
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-23

Abstract:
Section 524 of the Bankruptcy Code divides the consumer bankruptcy attorney?s loyalties between the client and the court. On the one hand, the attorney is the gatekeeper for the court in ensuring that whether a debtor enters into a reaffirmation agreement is balanced against one of the primary objectives of the bankruptcy system - to give the debtor a ?fresh start.? On the other hand, the attorney has an obligation under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to pursue the client?s objectives during the bankruptcy representation.

This Article is about the lawyer-client relationship. Ethics scholars have traditionally adopted either a client-autonomy or paternalistic model to analyze the lawyer-client relationship. This Article rejects both and proposes a collaborative model of lawyer-client decision-making. Congress must free bankruptcy lawyers of their ethical conflict, so that lawyers can work in collaboration with their clients to help debtors improve financially post-bankruptcy. Then, the client might be able to be her own gatekeeper, freeing both the courts and attorneys from that responsibility.

Full post as published by Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog on November 22, 2010 (boomark / email).