Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> The Canadian Privacy Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: The Canadian Privacy Law BlogOpt out, while you still can: Airport security reaches new levels of absurdity
"Ask the Pilot", over at Salon.com, has a great/sad illustration of the absurdity of idiotic policies and slavish adherence to these policies at airport screening: Airport security reaches new levels of absurdity - Ask the Pilot - Salon.com.
Over the past year, I've been "randomly" selected for the virtual stip-search about a half dozen times. Each time, I've opted out and have gone for the pat-down. I don't really have a problem with modesty and would probably streak through the terminal for a reasonable fee, but I do so just to make a point. The machines are pointless security theatre.
On my last trip to Ottawa, the CATSA screener guy directed me to the naked machine after I went through the metal detector. He didn't tell me it was optional. I said "I decline." And he was visibly surprised. When I opted out, he tried to sell me on the benefits of going into naked machine: "It only takes two seconds."
"No thanks. I opt out."
He was also the guy who got to give me the rub-down, and I'm sure I got extra-special treatment because I defied him.
A few weeks before, when I opted out to a woman CATSA person, she said I'd have to wait for a male guy. I said I didn't care if it was her, but I still had to wait. But she had to hold onto my boarding pass to make sure I didn't make a break for it (though I'd been through the metal detector). A few minutes passed and there was no male CATSA guy available. Obviously upset she was having to loiter with me, she quickly ran the explosive decting swab on my hands, gave me the all-clear and sent me on my way.
Does this make you any safer?
Body scanning, which started as random, is becoming de rigeur in the United States and I will not be surprised to see it make a similar change in Canada. It's the classic bait and switch: don't worry ... it's optional and we randomly choose people for secondary screening through the scanner. Now that we have them installed in all the airports, it's the scanner or the glove. Then it'll be the scanner or the train.
Recently, an American blogger wrote about his surreal experience in trying to opt-out at San Diego airport and it has garnered over 4000 comments so far.
Not surprisingly, this has led to a backlash. A number of groups in the US are calling for national opt-out day in airports on the busiest travel day of the year. I expect that it will have an impact on Thanksgiving travelers and will get some notice.
Full post as published by The Canadian Privacy Law Blog on November 15, 2010 (boomark / email).
Rightwing Extremism
Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Airport Security
Jackson County pays former employee $200,000 whistleblower settlement.
Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and Social Security Administration
allegedly denied social security insurance to disabled and elderly immigrants.
Air Pollution
Low Levels May Increase Stroke Risk
Herbal Medicines
Contain High Levels of Toxic Metals
Casper Halloween Figures
Recalled due to High Lead Levels
Nutro
Recalls Dry Cat Food Products due to High Zinc Levels

Israeli Airport Security Measures
More Great Moments in Airport Security:
Airport security breach leaves TSA in hot water www.privateofficer.com
Using Biomarkers for Airport Security
More Airport Security Tradeoffs
THE SYSTEM WORKED! TSA: Security fails to spot gun at Mont. airport. Officials say security scree









