ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Credit Slips

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Bankruptcy

: Credit Slips

MERS: Symptom or Cause

By Katie Porter

ADVERTISEMENTS

MERS, which stands for Mortgage Electronic Registration System, is under fire. Courts in a few states have held that MERS does not have standing to pursue a foreclosure in its own name, and there is a pending multi-district litigation claim against MERS. The most recent MERS news is the press release by the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia has a non-judicial foreclosure process that begins with a Notice of Foreclosure form. The AG has announced that people facing foreclosure can assume that the completion of such a Notice, with its identification of the "Holder of the Note" and the "Security Instrument recorded" in the DC land records means that every intermediate transfer of the security interest is documented in the public records. Under the AG's interpretation, MERS does not meet this requirement. MERS, when it works properly, is privately tracking the transfer of mortgages without notation in the public records.

I tend to think MERS is a symptom of a larger phenomenon about how the mortgage industry operated. Just as with robo-signing or with efforts to treat the ownership of a note as a "technicality," the industry designed and built systems for lending and servicing loans that failed to take into account traditional legal doctrines. Why did they redesign these traditional systems? To make securitized lending cheaper and faster. MERS undoubtedly achieved these goals, but at what cost. By moving the recordation of transfers of land from a public function to the private realm, industry got to write, and then ignore at its will, the state laws requiring the recordation of land transfers. Now, when the legality of MERS is called into question, one defense seems to be to argue that MERS is too big to fail. So many loans used it, how can it possibly not be legal? If Fannie/Freddie used  it, doesn't that make it all right? Interesting logic.

As a final note, for those wanting more information on MERS, I recommend Chris Peterson's article: Two Face: Demystifying MERS's Land Title Theory, available here.

 

Full post as published by Credit Slips on November 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0113 secs (new cache)