ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

Say on Pay and SEC Rulemaking (The Possibility of Private Ordering)

By J Robert Brown Jr.

ADVERTISEMENTS

The SEC has put out a rule proposal designed to implement the say on pay provisions in Dodd-Frank.  See Exchange Act Release No. 63124 (Oct. 18, 2010).?

During the debate over access, much of the opposition centered on the interference with private ordering.  Most (including this Blog) view private ordering as a critical and essential component of the governance process.  The problem with private ordering with respect to access was that there was no evidence, given management's control over the private ordering process, that it would occur.  In fact, as had been the case, the likely result was a categorical rule that denied shareholders access to the company's proxy statement.   See Opting Only in: Contractarians, Waiver of Liability Provisions, and the Race to the Bottom (discussing example of provision designed to result in "private ordering" but instead resulted in categorical rule that favored management). 

Say on pay will provide another opportunity to show the strengths and weaknesses of private ordering.  As the Commission noted in the release, Rule 14a-21 was only a minimum. 

  • While not required, our rules 'would not preclude an issuer from seeking more specific shareholder opinion through separate votes on cash compensation, golden parachute policy, severance or other aspects of compensation.' See Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs regarding The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010, S. Rep. No. 111-176 at 133 (2010).

Given that say on pay is advisory, there would seem to be little harm in expanding the matters submitted to shareholders for approval.  Director compensation is another item that could be added to the list.  Once this rule is implemented, however, it remains to be seen whether the approach is in fact categorical, doing little more than what is specifically mandated by the rule. 

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on November 03, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0186 secs (new cache)