Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> IPTAblog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: IPTAblogValuing Music
By Andrew Raff, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
In the NY Times, Billy Bragg suggests that the social networking sites that have developed their audiences by hosting music should have to consider paying royalties for that music: The Royalty Scam In our discussions, we largely ignored the elephant in the room: the issue of whether he ought to consider paying some kind of royalties to the artists. After all, wasn’t he using their music to draw members — and advertising — to his business? Social-networking sites like Bebo argue that they have no money to distribute — their value is their membership. Well, last week Michael Birch realized the value of his membership. I’m sure he’ll be rewarding those technicians and accountants who helped him achieve this success. Perhaps he should also consider the contribution of his artists.TechCrunch's Michael Arrington suggests that recorded music has no value and that artists should be happy to be able to take advantage of free hosting. These Crazy Musicians Still Think They Should Get Paid For Recorded Music
Recorded music is nothing but marketing material to drive awareness of an artist. Websites that bring that music to listeners are doing artists a favor. In fact, they’re doing them a favor that they should (and will) be paid for. Young artists and songwriters in particular benefit from these services - Until a few years ago they had almost no way to break into the mainstream without getting a label to promote them. Now those walls are being torn down, and Bragg has the audacity to complain about it.e-consultancy.com (via pho): These crazy bloggers still think they understand the music business "While Bragg makes some interesting points, I disagree with him. Musicians and labels that upload their music to social networks ostensibly know what they're doing and understand that there is no agreement for royalties." Why shouldn't songwriters and recording artists ally in order to host music only on social networking sites that agree to pay royalties?
Full post as published by IPTAblog on March 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Apple Inc.
allegedly maintained an illegal monopoly on the digital music market.
Music Teacher
Town of Brookline agrees to $150,000 settlement after the former employee exploited a freshman student.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

From My Archives: Thoughts on Valuing Human Life
Music Is (A)live - But Music Industry Looks For Future
Valuing Theorists, Valuing Practitioners in the Legal Academy
More and more downloaded music
Warner Proposes $5/Month "Music Tax" for MP3 Downloads









