ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> National Eminent Domain Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Real Estate & Property Law

: National Eminent Domain Blog

Nevada Fight on PISTOL Continues

By Alan Ackerman

ADVERTISEMENTS

Vin Suprynowicz, a lead columnist for the Las Vegas News, did it right. He wonders why the yelling is so loud by governmental agencies which will be minimally affected by PISTOL amendment to the Constitution in Nevada, yet the same people maintain the project has no effect, for future activities.

The reality is that PISTOL may be a slight overreaction to an aggressive government, but with mining and gambling controlling the state, protection of private rights have totally failed in Nevada.

Las Vegas Review-Journal

For instance, PISTOL allows landowners to collect attorneys' fees if they fight a threatened eminent domain taking. Mr. Snow says this provision is already generating many "scurrilous suits," including one in which a landowner is suing on the contention his property's value has been decreased because regional transportation planners marked his land as a future bridge site.

Get it? If you can't sell your land, or if you have to sell it for less because it's identified on an official government map for future seizure to provide the space for a police station or a bridge abutment, and you sue for the amount by which they've thus devalued your land, Mr. Snow considers you "scurrilous."

Meantime, Mr. Woodbury insists they don't want a very big change: Under their plan, the landowner still would be able to "apply to the court" for attorney fees ... and cross their fingers.

PISTOL, easily approved by voters in 2006 and 2008, calls for separate jury trials to determine "public use" as well as property value. Mr. Woodbury et al. say that will take too long -- they'd rather have such decisions made by local judges, like Stephen Huffaker, the one who made several adverse rulings against the Pappases before acknowledging that, maybe, his ownership of stock in the Four Queens downtown casino constituted, um, maybe, just a slight conflict of interest.

Full post as published by National Eminent Domain Blog on October 30, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0135 secs (new cache)