ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Poison Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Health Law

: Food Poison Blog

FSIS Announces New Video Monitoring Guidelines

By David Babcock

ADVERTISEMENTS

On October 14, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced new guidelines for in-plant video monitoring at meat and poultry establishments.  The new guidelines are drafted with the stated intent of strengthening both food safety and humane animal handling practices. The guidelines do not require video monitoring. The guidelines, however, do allow the use of video or electronic monitoring to meet FSIS record-keeping requirements.

It was actually video footage of beef production at a Westland/Hallmark plant that surfaced in February, 2008 that raised very serious concerns about humane handling. The video detailed the abuse of 'downer' cattle. The video, and subsequent USDA investigation led to the recall of 143 million pounds of meat, the largest in U.S. history.

The apparent goal of FSIS' new guidelines is too reduce the likelihood of such occurrences, and monitor compliance with existing food safety regulations:

This document provides guidance to industry on the use of video or other electronic monitoring or recording equipment for monitoring operations and facilities for various purposes, including monitoring product inventory, conducting surveillance of establishment premises in a voluntary food defense plan, using a systematic approach to ensure that livestock are handled humanely, or ensuring that poultry good commercial practices are followed.

FSIS suggests ways in which the use of video might improve compliance with humane handling regulations:

Video or other electronic monitoring or recording equipment could provide an establishment with continuous information on what is occurring at all times with humane handling at the establishment, freeing the establishment from having to rely on spot checks. Also, the possibility of multi-dimensional views of an establishment's processes with these technologies can bring together information that bears on humane handling, food safety, compliance, and product quality at one time. Thus, video or other electronic monitoring or recording equipment can provide new information for establishments to use to improve process control. The information gathered can also be used by establishments to train their employees.

Additional guidance is provided on how video recordings can be used to meet various FSIS record-keeping requirements. There is also guidance on increasing biosecurity at production facilities through the use of video surveillance.

The guidelines are in draft form while FSIS seeks approval of the document from the Office of Management and Budget. The FSIS is currently accepting comments on the draft guidelines.

Full post as published by Food Poison Blog on October 20, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0119 secs (new cache)