ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> McLeod Law Offices

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Bankruptcy

: McLeod Law Offices

Co-Debtor Stay in Chapter 13: The Debtor's Business

By Bill McLeod, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

People own businesses: corporations, LLCs or other types of formal or informal business entities. When those people need to file bankruptcy, does the automatic stay that takes effect immediately upon filing also extend to those wholly-owned companies? The Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York ruled on that issue on February 8, 2008.

That debtor filed for relief under Chapter 13 and was self-employed as a general contractor. He was the sole member of an LLC. Under Chapter 13, there exists a co-debtor stay, and this debtor wanted to ensure that the co-debtor stay extended to his LLC.

The Court noted that the LLC was not eligible to be a Chapter 13 debtor since it was a business entity, and not an individual. Chapter 13 is limited to individuals only. In addition, the co-debtor stay applies specifically to consumer debts, not commercial or business debtors. On his petition, the debtor noted that the debts were primarily consumer debts. And finally, there was nothing in the Bankruptcy Code allowing an individual and a business to be joint debtors. The request to extend the stay to the LLC was denied.

It is important to note that this is the bright line rule. There are circumstances that might permit a court to extend the stay to a non-debtor business entity in Chapter 13, but whether that can occur is really determined on a case by case basis. For example, if there is a claim against a non-debtor, and the debtor is a guarantor, not extending the stay could have an adverse economic consequence on the debtor?s ability to reorganize. The extension of the stay to non-debtors has been limited to those claims that ?threaten serious risk to a reorganization of debtor?s estate in the form of immediate adverse consequences.?

The case is In re McCormick, 381 BR 594 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 2008).

Full post as published by McLeod Law Offices on March 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0175 secs (new cache)