ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogCircuit Snippets
By Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
It is constitutional to require persons accused of federal felonies to give a DNA sample as a condition of granting bail, the Ninth Circuit held. The Court found it was reasonable because the sample was only demanded after a judge had determined that there is probable cause to support the charges. The government's interests outweighed any privacy interests the person might have in his or her DNA. The physical intrusion is "minimal." Concurring, Judge Lucero reasoned that, because the DNA collection was pursuant to a federal statute and program, the intrusions were not random or arbitrary. Judge Schroeder dissented, and would have continued to restrict the collection of DNA to those actually convicted of crimes. US v. Pool, No. 09-10303, 2010 WL 3554049 (9th Cir...continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on October 15, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Two little and notable Ninth Circuit sentencing opinions
Ninth Circuit affirms above-guideline sentence with Kimbrough twist
Google Loses French Copyright Case
A remarkable (failed) judicial effort to nullify a mandatory minimum sentence
Heller and the Second Amendment stir up controversy








