Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Sacramento Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Sacramento Injury Lawyer BlogSacramento Jury Will Decide If Surgical Malpractice Caused Patient's Death, Part 13 of 13
By Moseley Collins, Esq.
It is worth noting that situations similar to those described in this medical malpractice case could just as easily occur at any of the healthcare facilities in the area, such as Kaiser Permanente, U.C. Davis Medical Center, Mercy, Sutter, or any skilled nursing facility.
(Please also note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this wrongful death case and its proceedings.)
In considering whether res ipsa loquitur applies, it is not for the trial court to ascertain whether defendant's negligence is the more likely explanation of the accident; it should merely determine whether plaintiff has produced sufficient substantial evidence to permit a jury to draw such an inference, and where reasonable men might differ on the balance of probabilities it should be left to the jury. Ghema v. Ford Motor Co. (1966) 246 Cal. App. 2d 639, 55 Cal. Rptr. 94.
Where - as here - the evidence conflicts or is subject to different inferences, it is for the jury, under proper instructions, to determine whether each of the conditions necessary to bring into play the res ipsa loquitur rule are present. Robledo v. Los Angeles (1967) 252 Cal. App. 2d 285,60 Cal. Rptr. 328. For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins.
In considering the applicability of res ipsa loquitur, it is not for the trial court to ascertain whether a defendant's negligence is the more likely explanation of the accident; the court merely determines whether the plaintiff has produced sufficient substantial evidence to permit a jury to draw such an inference; and, where reasonable men may differ as to the balance of the probabilities, the trial judge must leave that question to the jury. Albers v. Greyhound Corp. (1970) 4 Cal. App. 3d 463, 84 Cal. Rptr. 846.
Full post as published by Sacramento Injury Lawyer Blog on October 14, 2010 (boomark / email).
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Gallbladder Surgery Errors Damage Bile Duct
X-ray Procedures Can Reduce Gall Bladder Surgery Error Rates
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Patient Awarded $10 Million
In Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
Jury Awards $1.8 Million in Legal Malpractice Suit
Jury Awards $1.8 Million in Legal Malpractice Suit
Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Jury Awards $82.5M in Workplace Death Lawsuit
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
$17.5 Million
Awarded in Medical Malpractice by Dallas Jury
Doctor Paralyzes Patient
Hospital agrees to $3.7 million settlement in malpractice lawsuit.

Surgeons Involved in Half of All Medical Malpractice Suits in US
$2.5 Million Jury Verdict in Malpractice Case
Harford County Woman Awarded $3.5 Million Maryland Surgical Malpractice Verdict
Pittsburgh Med-Mal Jury Finds Hospital Negligent, Awards $0 Damages
New System Offers Extra Precautions Against Leaving Objects in Bodies After Surgery
Medical Malpractice Mole Worth $1.3 Million







