Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bailout Blogs -> Calculated Risk
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bailout
: Calculated RiskFed's Lacker: Inflation "now on Target"
By Anonymous
ADVERTISEMENTS
Here is a different view ...From Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker: Economic Outlook, October 2010
[I]nflation is now on target, as far as I'm concerned. Over the last 12 months the price index for personal consumption expenditure has risen 1.5 percent, which is exactly what I've been recommending for the last six years. We also track a core price index that omits volatile food and energy prices, and it is sending the same message, having risen by 1.4 percent over the last 12 months. I believe that the Fed's best contribution to our nation's economic prosperity over time would be to keep inflation stable near the current 1.5 percent rate. But inflation has been lower this year, with overall inflation increasing at only a 0.7 percent annual rate, which is too low for me. I would point out that these inflation numbers often run hot or cold for several months at a time, which is why economists focus on the 12-month number I cited a moment ago. I am not yet convinced that inflation is likely to remain undesirably low. Moreover, the public's expectation of future inflation is not at such a low level; indeed, the latest survey from the University of Michigan puts the public's short-run inflation expectation at 2.2 percent. So I do not see a material risk of deflation ? that is, an outright decline in the price level.Lacker speech is a little strange because he mentions three possible reasons for the high unemployment rate - skills mismatch, extended benefits, uncertainty regarding government policies - and leaves out the most widely accepted reason: lack of aggregate demand. Weird.
And on inflation, core CPI (from the BLS) is up 1.0% over the last 12 months and median CPI from the Cleveland Fed (an alternative measure of inflation) is up only 0.5% over the last year - so I'd argue inflation is below Lacker's target.
Lacker is not currently on the FOMC.
Full post as published by Calculated Risk on October 14, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Target
Settles with NFB for $6 Million
Circo Booster Seats
Recalled by Target
Target, National Federation of the Blind
Settle Class Action for $6 Million
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Feds Lacker: Expansion in Fed Lending Creates Instability
Insider joins Fed critics faulting credit crisis programs as risky
Lacker: Credit Turmoil Fueled by Economy, Not Financial Markets
Will the Fed's exit from the mortgage markets bring inflation









