Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Cavanagh Williams
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Cavanagh WilliamsFormer Negligence Act Limitation Period for Claim Over Applies to 2008 Claim Arising Out of 2001 MVA
In Davey v. Davey, Mr. Justice Dougald R. McDermid was dealing with a motion to amend the statement of claim in a motor vehicle case. The plaintiffs in one of two actions that had been ordered to be tried together moved to increase the general damages from $5 million to $20 million and the special damages from $500,000 to $1 million.
The defendants did not seriously oppose this relief, but sought leave to amend their own pleading, to add a crossclaim against the plaintiff’s sister (who had been driving one of the cars involved in the accident) and to add a counterclaim and a third party claim against the plaintiff’s father (the owner of that car).
The motion for leave to bring the crossclaim, counterclaim and third party claim, was opposed by counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the plaintiff’s sister (a defendant driver). Both argued that the proposed claims were barred by the provisions of the Limitations Act, 2002, which came into force on January 1, 2004.
Formerly, claims for contribution or indemnity in cases such as this were governed by s. 8 of the Negligence Act. That section permitted such claims to be made within one year of the date of settlement or judgment of the claim by injured person. The Limitations Act, 2002 has replaced that provision with a two-year limitation period that runs from the date on which the person making the claim for contribution or indemnity was served with the claim in relation to which contribution or indemnity is being sought. So, it is a much less elastic limitation period than was its predecessor.
However, Justice McDermid was satisfied that the two-year limitation period in the present statute did not apply and that the case was still governed by s. 8 of the Negligence Act, with the result that the proposed claim for contribution or indemnity was timely. He reached this decision on the basis that the acts or omissions on which the claims were based had taken place before the effective date of the Limitations Act, 2002.
Full post as published by Cavanagh Williams on March 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Ladder Accident Injury Claims
Were you or a loved one injured in a ladder accident?
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
AIG Settles Injury Claim
for $18 Million
Failure-to-accommodate claim yields $1.82M award
$1.82 Million Awarded in Employment Lawsuit
Recovery Claim
Florida Insurance Guarantee Association agrees to pay $14 million settlement to Home Solutions of America for construction services.
Negligence
resulting in personal injury.
Lifeblood
alleging negligence after computers were stolen which contained personal information.
Jefferson County Sewer System
alleging fraud, negligence, and conspiracy resulting in excessive fees.

Exception for reopening claim applied retroactively: OFFICEWARE V. JACKSON (SC 3/20/2008)
Legal Malpractice Statutes of Limitation - Tort and Contract
Iowa Car Accidents and Personal Injuries Myths and Mysteries Revealed
Time limitation for a will contest also applies to intentional interference claim
Questions, questions: Risk-Utility Test








