ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Ethics

: Legal Ethics Forum

Legal Ethics Items (October 11, 2010)

ADVERTISEMENTS
  • Tax Prof Blog: law schools drop some night programs.
  • News account re Fish v. Rutan & Tucker: in California, a patent lawyer who loaned a client money and took a security interest was required to indemnify his prior law firm when the client sued the firm, because the patent lawyer's acts violated the applicable ethics rules. One of the interesting wrinkles was that the partnership agreement provided that departing partners who then competed locally lost indemnity rights against the firm -- an anti-competitive provision that was nonetheless deemed reasonable.
  • A Massachusetts case, Commonwealth v. Wayne Miranda, explores whether the payment of relocation expenses and reward money to witnesses in a criminal trial amounted to compensating witnesses.  The court affirmed the conviction but enunciated a rule for the future: "While the contingent monetary rewards in this case neither violated due process nor constituted structural error, we declare, exercising our superintendence authority, that prosecutors in the future may not provide (or participate in providing) monetary awards to witnesses contingent on a defendant's conviction. In so declaring, we recognize that, to prove the crime charged, prosecutors often need to procure the cooperation and truthful information or testimony of reluctant witnesses. The interests of justice, however, are not well served when a witness's reward is contingent on the conviction of a defendant rather than the provision of truthful information or testimony."
  • At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone isn't too impressed with the New York Times's take on the political activities of Justice Thomas's wife.  (Renee Knake had commented on the article here.)
  • Toledo Blade recaps the judicial race for chief justice of Ohio, where the rival candidates' campaigns are focusing on gender diversity and political diverity.
  • Prof. Neil Hamilton comments on Professor Thomas Morgan's book, the Vanishing American Lawyer.
  • In New Zealand, a suggestion that barristers return to the wearing of gowns and wigs for serious criminal trials is met with the counter-argument that formal dress is the "fawning debris of a stratified society in which the quality of the cloth was the quality of the wearer."
  • In the UK, lawyers from Lincolnshire welcomed the introduction of the Legal Ombudsman, who can force lawyers to pay compensation to clients or return fees to clients in amounts up to £30,000.
  • In Australia (WSJ), the SA-Attorney General highlighted the potentially high costs of national regulation of lawyers, commenting that  "the question really comes down to, is it going to be the Rolls-Royce centralist model or a federal model with minimal cost?"
  • In Scotland, there continues to be debate over alternative business structures.


Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on October 11, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)