Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance BlogDodd-Frank Provisions Affecting Executive Pay
By Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance
Today's column focuses on several of the provisions in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111-203 (July 21, 2010) affecting executive compensation. These are (i) Say on Pay (including discussion of Proxy Access as it relates to Say on Pay), (ii) the so-called "clawback" provisions and (iii) the new requirement that a ratio of CEO pay to the median of the pay of all other employees be disclosed in the proxy statement. (These are only some of the provisions of Dodd-Frank that will impact on the executive pay process; a longer list of provisions relating to executive pay is noted separately below.)
Taken together, the provisions in Dodd-Frank that affect the executive pay process quite arguably will have the broadest and most significant impact on that pay process of any set of new rules ever contained in one law. The federal government, of course, has impacted for a long time on executive pay through tax and securities laws (and through temporary rulemaking such as that under Pay Controls (1971) and the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) (2008)). But it is unlikely that there has ever been a single law that contains the potential long-term consequences for the process of setting executive pay that are contained in these provisions of Dodd-Frank.
Click here to read the complete post...
Full post as published by The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog on October 05, 2010 (boomark / email).
Landlord Tenant Laws and Provisions
State and City Laws Related to Residential House and Apartment Leases
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Options Backdating
Former Broadcom executive settles $1.3 million stock option backdating lawsuit.
Contract Extortion
County Executive Robert Janiszewski ordered to pay Hudson County a $650,000 racketeering settlement.

Whistleblower provisions under Dodd-Frank
Dodd-Frank Forum - And Now for Something Completely Different
Regulating the Field: Why I'm Not Sure Dodd-Frank Dropped the Ball on Glass-Steagall
Dodd-Frank Criminal Provisions
Dodd-Frank Forum: Where's the Fiduciary Duty for Brokers
No Mandatory Arbitration of Dodd-Frank Whistleblowing Claims








