ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> New York Federal Criminal Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: New York Federal Criminal Practice

EDNY Judge Holds It is Not a Crime to Conspire to Commit a Legal Act While Mistakenly Believing it to Be Illegal

ADVERTISEMENTS

It's not often that a federal judge quotes a Hollywood movie in its written opinion, but Judge Vitaliano did so to neat effect in United States v. Ali, 06 CR 200 (ENV), 2008 WL 682594 (E.D.N.Y. March 7, 2008), an odd case in which the government attempted to criminalize conduct that was not in fact illegal. 

In a prosecution for conspiracy to evade currency reporting requirements, among other charges, the government sought to introduce at trial certain checks the defendants had intentionally failed to report, mistakenly believing the checks to be subject to reporting requirements.  In effect, the government sought to expand the law of conspiracy to cover acts believed to be illegal which are not in fact illegal. 

Denying the in limine motion, the court pointed out that conspiracy law targets agreements with a criminal objective because such agreements on their own are a threat to social order.  It does not target simply "the naked possibility of 'conspiring to conspire'" (quoting the movie Traffic).  "Where the act contemplated is not criminal, nothing criminal has crystallized, and any perceived threat to social order dissipates.  It matters not that the alleged conspirators mistakenly believe that they are actually agreeing to do something the law forbids."  The court went on:

It is beyond troubling for the Court to contemplate a legal world in which particularly misguided individuals, assuming their actions run afoul of the law when they in fact do not, carve out their own realms of criminal activity beyond the contemplation of even the Congress. In this self-defined regime of hypothetical conspiracy law, the realm of criminalizable conduct would be bound only by the degree to which potential defendants are misinformed, misguided or simply stupid. Although such traits have paved the road for many to run afoul of the law, the bounds of the criminal law are for the Congress alone to determine. 

Full post as published by New York Federal Criminal Practice on March 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)