Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How AppealingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania issues its ruling in a case presenting the question whether Pennsylvania's Private Road Act is an unconstitutional taking of property for a private purpose in violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution
This is the case in which I signed an amicus brief written by Paul Wolfson, Rachel Brand, and Steve Lehotsky of WilmerHale on behalf of the Institute for Justice. That amicus brief is cited on page 11 of the majority opinion (which is page 13 of the PDF file).
Full post as published by How Appealing on October 01, 2010 (boomark / email).
Private Investigators and Detectives
Services Provided by Private Investigators
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Pennsylvania Employment Law
alleged violations of Pennsylvania labor laws including discrimination, harassment and overtime pay.
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
Pennsylvania Juvenille Detention
Judges Face Class Action
US Government
alleging land surveyors should not be allowed on private property to build a US Mexican border wall.
Utilities Whistleblower
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities agrees to $485,000 fine for setting up a private bank account.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Hate Crimes Law Used Against Evangelists Violates State Constitution
Error in Judgment Rule FINALLY kicked to the Curb in Pennsylvania
Redevelopment Takings - Constitutional Authority and Limitations
Bowmaster Decides Difficult Medicaid Lien Issues







