ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Structured Settlements 4Real

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Structured Settlements 4Real

Risks of Investing in Structured Settlement Factoring Deals

By John Darer

ADVERTISEMENTS

Pete Vodola of West Hartford, Connecticut's Seiger Gfeller Laurie, LLP has begun a welcome blog series covering the risks of investing in structured settlement payment rights. Before investing money one must understand the upside AND the downside, even if remote.

With more and more individual investors seeking to do what had been the province of the hedge funded and large institutional investors, like insurance companies and the applicability for solving tort victim needs also on the table, it is important that buyers representatives, buyers, attorneys and others have an appropriate level of understanding.

Vodola is an established attorney expert,  who represents life insurance companies who issue , or have issued, structured settlement annuities to assure (among other things) compliance with state structured settelment protection laws and to protect the interests of those companies in structured settlement factoring transactions. 

The first post in the series is entitled  When is a Court Order Not The Last Word? 

With respect to structured settlement factoring transactions, Vodola makes very clear that:

1. "What is not in dispute is that most structured settlement factoring transactions, since 2002, are effectuated via a court order".

2. "What is also not in dispute is that the VAST MAJORITY of court orders are the last word in the effectiveness of structured settlement factoring transactions.  Put another way, the orders remain in place, and the payments are paid in the manner spelled out in the orders".

Vodola correctly observes Wall Street Journal column from this summer may have hit a nerve, but makes an incorrect assumption about the impetus to my 3 post response.(here, here and here) and another one by Andrew Cravenho of Settlement Quotes.

My response to the Wall Street Journal article stands on its own and I encourage thoe who wish to to read the links to the posts in Vodola's article or by following the links just above.

It's important to point out another thing that is not in dispute. Vodola HAS NOT said "Don't Do It!"

Yet one does not want to be part of the corollary to the "vast majority" cited above and I look forward to Pete Vodola's upcoming series.


Full post as published by Structured Settlements 4Real on September 24, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0228 secs (new cache)