ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Ethics

: Legal Ethics Forum

DOJ's handling of voter intimidation case continues to draw scrutiny

ADVERTISEMENTS
Pajama Media: I've been watching this issue bubble for some time and still can't tell if there's any merit to it.  But one of the career lawyers at DOJ will apparently testify despite earlier instructions that he not do so.  My sense, from a distance and based solely on news accounts and partisan op-eds, was that I hadn't seen any good reason why the DOJ abandoned its default judgment as to the second man on the scene, hadn't seen any reason why the national organization or its leadership had ever been named in the first place, and had seen hints that some DOJ lawyers had made improper comments within the DOJ about enforcement policies for civil rights law.  We may see . . . 

Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on September 23, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.02 secs (new cache)