ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklylast edition of summer 2010
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
This week’s edition notes:
Leading off this edition are two cases from unlikely suspects. This past Wednesday the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted habeas relief in Ex Parte Jimmie Urbano Lucero holding “that applicant?s counsel failed to investigate applicant?s background or present mitigating evidence at the punishment phase in violation of Rompilla v Beard.” In Joshua Wayne Andrews v. Commonwealth the Virginia Supreme Court held that where a double murder resulted in four capital murder convictions double jeopardy required a new penalty phase proceeding.
The Texas Forensic Science Commission on Friday declined to clear fire investigators of professional misconduct for determining that arson caused a 1991 fire that killed three girls and led to the conviction and execution of Todd Willingham...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on September 20, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Health Wonk Review: the dog days of summer edition
New Editions of Three Canadian Legal Research and Writing Guides a Review
Public Edition of The Beanstockd Game
Checklist for Reviewing Wills in 2010







