Religion & Law

He writes, in today's NYT:

But in turning out for their beleaguered pope, Britain?s Catholics acknowledged something essential about their faith that many of the Vatican?s critics, secular and religious alike, persistently fail to understand. They weren?t there to voice agreement with Benedict, necessarily. They were there to show their respect ? for the pontiff, for his office, and for the role it has played in sustaining Catholicism for 2,000 years.

Conventional wisdom holds that such respect is increasingly misplaced, and that the papacy is increasingly a millstone around Roman Catholicism?s neck. If it weren?t for the reactionaries in the Vatican, the argument runs, priests might have been permitted to marry, forestalling the sex abuse crisis. Birth control, gay relationships, divorce and remarriage might have been blessed, bringing lapsed Catholics back into the fold. Theological dissent would have been allowed to flourish, creating a more welcoming environment for religious seekers.

And yet none of these assumptions have any real evidence to back them up. . . .

On Saturday, Benedict addressed Britain?s politicians in the very hall where Sir Thomas More, the great Catholic martyr, was condemned to death for opposing the reformation of Henry VIII. It was an extraordinary moment, and a reminder of the resilience of Catholicism, across a gulf of years that?s consumed thrones, nations, entire civilizations.

This, above all, is why the crowds cheered for the pope, in Edinburgh and London and Birmingham ? because almost five centuries after the Catholic faith was apparently strangled in Britain, their church is still alive.

It seems to me that Douthat is onto something.  That is, and whatever one thinks of any particular pope or papal writing, the papacy itself has played, for centuries, a crucial structural role in the project of constituting governments and protecting authentic freedom.  It is permanent, institutional, tangible evidence of the existence of, and need for, authority that is not the state's.