Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Justice

Intellectual Property Law

: IP Justice

ACTA?s Misguided Effort to Increase Govt Spying and Ratchet-Up IPR Enforcement at Public Expense

By Robin Gross

IP Justice Comments to the U.S.T.R. on the proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). IP Justice firmly believes that ACTA?s costs to the public far outweigh any public benefit it might provide. The financial expense to tax-payers to fund ACTA would be enormous and steal scarce resources away from programs that deal with genuine public needs like providing education and eliminating hunger. ACTA would burden the judicial system and divert badly needed law enforcement and customs resources away from public security and towards private profit. Unfortunately the zeal to ?beef-up? enforcement measures on which ACTA rides often leads to the violation of privacy rights, bypassing due process protections, and cutting-off the free flow of information. ACTA proposes to set new international norms to lock countries into pre-determined policy choices when flexibility is needed.

Full post as published by IP Justice on March 21, 2008 (boomark / email).