Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsUSPTO Updates Obviousness Examination Guidelines
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued an update to its obviousness guidelines, publishing a notice in the Federal Register (75 Fed. Reg. 53644) that highlights case law developments on obviousness since the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. The update supplements the Office's 2007 guidelines, in which the Office identified seven rationales gleaned from the KSR decision (see "Patent Office Issues Examination Guidelines Regarding Obviousness after KSR"). The Office indicates that the update to the obviousness examination guidelines is intended to remind Office personnel of the principles of...Full post as published by Patent Docs on September 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

USPTO Guidelines for Determining Obviousness
Updated KSR Examination Guidelines
Obviousness After KSR - The U.S. Patent Offices New Published Examination Guidelines
Obviousness in View of KSR According to USPTO
The Evolution of MPEP 2143 - Prima Facie Case of Obviousness.








