International Law

"Everywhere and nowhere"

The Economist writes that social networking will become a ubiquitous feature of online life, but that does not mean it is a business:

So it is entirely conceivable that social networking, like web-mail, will never make oodles of money. That, however, in no way detracts from its enormous utility. Social networking has made explicit the connections between people, so that a thriving ecosystem of small programs can exploit this ?social graph? to enable friends to interact via games, greetings, video clips and so on.

Coming up for air

But should users really have to visit a specific website to do this sort of thing? ?We will look back to 2008 and think it archaic and quaint that we had to go to a destination like Facebook or LinkedIn to be social,? says Charlene Li at Forrester Research, a consultancy. Future social networks, she thinks, ?will be like air. They will be anywhere and everywhere we need and want them to be.? No more logging on to Facebook just to see the ?news feed? of updates from your friends; instead it will come straight to your e-mail inbox, RSS reader or instant messenger. No need to upload photos to Facebook to show them to friends, since those with privacy permissions in your electronic address book can automatically get them.

The problem with today's social networks is that they are often closed to the outside web. The big networks have decided to be ?open? toward independent programmers, to encourage them to write fun new software for them. But they are reluctant to become equally open towards their users, because the networks' lofty valuations depend on maximising their page views?so they maintain a tight grip on their users' information, to ensure that they keep coming back. As a result, avid internet users often maintain separate accounts on several social networks, instant-messaging services, photo-sharing and blogging sites, and usually cannot even send simple messages from one to the other. They must invite the same friends to each service separately. It is a drag.

Read more here.

Full post as published by Freedom to Differ on March 20, 2008 (boomark / email).