Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> TalkLeft
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: TalkLeftThe Post Partisan Unity Schtick Revisited
By Big Tent Democrat
ADVERTISEMENTS
Mark Schmitt, November 17, 2008:
The massive resistance Republicans posed to Clinton in 1993 is impossible to imagine today. The Republican coalition is utterly shattered, and the angry white Palin wing of the party, for all its visibility, is a minority even within a minority. [. . .] Obama, like other reconstructive leaders, will have to challenge some of the assumptions and institutions that come from the old era, just as FDR couldn't make lasting change until he had broken the Supreme Court's prevailing beliefs about the limits to government involvement in the economy. In one of the first articles about Obama's political career, from when he was first running for the Illinois Senate in 1995, he is quoted as telling the crowd that "it's time for politicians and other leaders to ... see voters, residents, or citizens as producers of change. ... What if a politician were to see his job as that of an organizer, as part teacher and part advocate, one who does not sell voters short but who educates them about the real choices before them?"
Fast forward to September 7, 2010, Steve Benen complaining about the WaPo:
This Washington Post headline features one of the most annoying words in politics: "Early on, Obama was more polarizing than we knew." [. . .] I suppose the point is that Obama wasn't supposed to be polarizing, and Balz's piece seems to suggest that it's the president's fault he ended up this way. That strikes me as deeply misguided[. . . .] The article suggests Obama, before getting elected, was more committed to putting partisan divisions behind us. As far as I can tell, though, Obama was equally committed to this after getting elected, but ran into a Republican Party more intent on destroying Obama than working with him. [. . .] The result was a president willing to compromise on just about every possible issue, and a GOP that refused to even consider a constructive role in policymaking.
Noonecouldhaveknown it would work out this way.
Speaking for me only
Full post as published by TalkLeft on September 07, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Washington Post WPO Securities Fraud
Washington Post WPO
Washington Post 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Washington Post 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

WILLIAM MCGURN: Lets Face It: Obama Is No Post-Partisan. Only last summer we were told that Ba
Weiss on the Post-Partisan Presidency
NY Workers Comp and Labor Market Attachment Revisited
The FEC and Partisan Splits: A Clarification









