ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Safety News

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Health Law

: Food Safety News

Seafood HACCP Snags Malaysian Fish Importer

By Dan Flynn and Suzanna Schreck

ADVERTISEMENTS
To import fish to the United States, a Malaysian company recently shared all of its seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan and supporting documents with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
When FDA got through grading those papers, GroPoint Fisheries failed.
The company, based in Labuan, Malaysia, learned that the "failure of a processor of fish or fishery products to have and implement" a plan that is in compliance with U.S. law and regulations "renders the fish or fishery products adulterated."
"Accordingly, your scombrotoxin-forming fish, such as your tunas and Mahi Mahi, are adulterated, in that they have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby they may have been rendered injurious to health," FDA said.
In a July 27 warning letter to GroPoint Fisheries, FDA both identified deviations and issues in the HACCP and supporting documents the company submitted.  Some of those concerns include:
- the plan for scombrotoxin-forming fish, such as tunas and Mahi Mahi, does not list a critical control point for overnight-refrigerated storage of fish.
- the plan monitoring procedures for "receiving at the dock" are inadequate to control scrombrotoxin formation.
- the plan's "plant receiving and wash fish" critical control point relies on visual inspection of ice surrounding fish, which is inadequate.
- the plan's "plant receiving" and "wash fish" should be considered independently and not combined.
- the plan shows use of chlorinated water to wash fish to control pathogens, but does not provide for controlling chlorine concentrations.

In asking for a response to its concerns within 30 working days, FDA also requested "at least five (5) product days worth of monitoring records to demonstrate you have implemented the revised plan..."
FDA also reminded the company that it could detain food products without physical examination upon entry to the U.S. through its Import Alerts if it finds a foreign firm is not in compliance with seafood HACCP requirements.

Full post as published by Food Safety News on August 30, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)