Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities RegulationLegislative History Clarifies Dodd-Frank Derivatives End User Exemption
By Jim Hamilton
Under the Act, specified financial entities are prohibited from using the end user exemption. While most large financial entities are not eligible to use the end user exemption for standardized swaps entered into with third parties, it would be appropriate for the SEC and CFTC to exempt from mandatory clearing and trading inter-affiliate swap transactions between wholly-owned affiliates of a financial entity. Congress also believes that small financial entities, such as banks, credit unions and farm credit institutions below $10 billion in assets, and possibly larger entities, will be permitted to utilize the end user clearing exemption with approval from the SEC and CFTC. The Act also includes an anti-evasion provision which provides the CFTC and SEC with authority to review and take action against entities which abuse the end user exemption. (Cong. Record, July 15, 2010, S5921).
A colloquy between Senator Susan Collin and Senator Chris Dodd revealed that it is the intent of Congress that an end user does not become a swap dealer by virtue of using an affiliate to hedge its own commercial risk. Thus, end users that execute swaps through an affiliate should not be deemed to be swap dealers under Dodd-Frank just because they hedge their risks through affiliates. (Cong. Record, July 15, 2010, p. S5907).
Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on August 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Toyota Recalls 3.8 million vehicles
Biggest Toyota Recall in History
Probation User Fees
Clark County Council pays $1.1 million settlement after misappropriating funds.
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Dodd-Frank Forum - And Now for Something Completely Different
Dodd-Frank Forum: The Role of Derivatives in Failing Firms
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act and the SEC: Profound Bits and Pieces
Dodd-Frank Forum: Bernard Madoff as the Big Idea
Dodd-Frank Forum: What's the big idea
Dodd-Frank Forum: Who Benefits from the New Resolution Authority









