ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Ethics

: Legal Ethics Forum

Legal ethics roundup (August 17, 2010)

ADVERTISEMENTS

  • From ALM: Latham helped found a medical-legal clinic that assists indigent patients.  (Pro bono semi-MDP?)  
  • The Ninth Circuit, in FTC v. Network Services Depot, ruled that lawyers have a duty of inquiry about retainers that may have their source in illegal business activities.  The trial court had placed the lawyers fees under a constructive trust.  (h/t: California Attorneys Fees Blog, which has commentary on the case.)
  • You just know things went poorly for the client and will now go poorly for the lawyer when the court writes (State ex rel. Counsel for Dis v. Sellers (Neb.)): "On September 3, 2008, respondent learned that another member of his law firm was representing an individual in a civil suit in which respondent's client was a defendant. Respondent informed his client of the conflict and told him that respondent could 'work around it.' Respondent did not get his client's informed consent or the informed consent of the other client involved in the conflict." 
  • Habeas Corpus Blog covers a new opinion from the Second Circuit (Friedman v. Rehal), imploring the trial court and prosecutor to re-examine a case where the accused might be innocent.  The opinion cites the new provisions of 3.8 concerning ethical duties post-conviction.
  • From The Lawyer's Weekly: Canada?s 14 law societies are considering relaxing their stringent confidentiality rules to allow lawyers to blow the whistle on clients who may be poised to commit fraud, or otherwise unlawfully inflict ?substantial financial injury,? on individuals. 
  • Cross-profession comparison: There's continuing fall-out and commentary about Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's decision to live rent-free in the home of a friend who now works for JP Morgan.  (Our own Stephen Gillers is quoted.)
  • In Johnson v. Gruma Corporation, The Ninth Circuit holds that an arbitrator's failure to disclose a professional tie to counsel for one of the parties was not grounds for vacating the arbitration award, and suggests that counsel raising the issue may have been "sand-bagging."
  •  



 

Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on August 17, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)