Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities RegulationDodd-Frank Sets Process for SEC and CFTC to Resolve Jurisdictional Status of Novel Derivatives Products
By Jim Hamilton
In their Joint Harmonization Report of October 2009, the SEC and CFTC recommended legislation to provide legal certainty with respect to novel derivative product listings, either by a legal determination about the nature of a product or through the use of the agencies? respective exemptive authorities.
According to Senator Lincoln, Dodd-Frank implements these recommendations by establishing a process that requires public accountability by ensuring that jurisdictional disputes are resolved at the Commission rather than staff level, and within a firm time frame. Specifically, either the SEC or the CFTC can request that the other one make a legal determination whether a particular product is a security under SEC jurisdiction or a futures contract or commodity option under CFTC jurisdiction; or grant an exemption with respect to the product. An agency receiving such a request from the other agency is to act on it within 120 days. (Cong. Record, July 15, 2010, S5923).
Dodd-Frank also provides for an expedited judicial review process for a legal determination where the agency making the request disagrees with the other?s determination. The Act also ensures that if either agency grants an exemption, the product will be subject to the other?s jurisdiction, so there will be no regulatory gaps. For example, the Commodity Exchange Act is amended to clarify that the CFTC has jurisdiction over options on securities and security indexes that are exempted by the SEC.
Senator Lincoln strongly urged the SEC and CFTC to work together under these new provisions to alleviate the ills that they themselves have identified. The SEC and CFTCs should make liberal use of their exemptive authorities to avoid spending taxpayer resources on legal fights over whether these novel derivative products are securities or futures, and to permit these important new products to trade in either or both a CFTC- or SEC-regulated environment. (Cong. Record, July 15, 2010, S5923).
Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on August 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Trading Fraud
Former stock trader to pay $55,000 in CFTC settlement.
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Wendy's International Inc.
allegedly fired illegal immigrant employees after missing a deadline to obtain legal status.
Signal International
allegedly lured foreign workers to US shipyards with false promises of permanent resident status.
Little Tikes Recalls Children?s Toy Workshop Sets
Little Tikes Recalls Children?s Toy Workshop Sets
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules

SEC & CFTC Divide Up Regulation over Derivatives
CFTC Chairman Speaks out on Regulating OTC Derivatives
Dodd-Frank Forum: The Role of Derivatives in Failing Firms
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act and the SEC: Profound Bits and Pieces
SEC & CFTC Seek Public Comment on Mixed Swaps









