Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Marler BlogS. 510 - FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Small Farm and Small Business Guide
By Bill Marler, Esq.
No Change in Agency for Regulated Foods
Only foods already regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be subject to S. 510. Section 403 maintains the existing firewall between FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture regulated foods and agricultural products.
No Change in Definition of Facility
Under the Bioterrorism Act of 2002, certain food businesses were considered 'facilities' and had to register with FDA. Farms and restaurants were exempted. This definition is not changed in S. 510. If an entity does not need to register now, it will not need to register under S. 510.
Flexibility for Small Businesses
Small businesses are given regulatory flexibility throughout S. 510. For example, small processors are given additional time to comply with new food safety practices and guidelines created by the bill and the Secretary may modify or exempt small processors from new hazard analysis and preventive control requirements based on size and risk. The legislation also requires the FDA to publish several user-friendly small entity compliance guides to assist firms with the implementation of new practices.
Scale Appropriate Produce Safety Standards
In coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture, FDA develops science-based standards for the safe production and harvesting of fruits and vegetables. Priority is given to specific fruits and vegetables that have the highest risk of food borne illness outbreaks. Flexibility is given for different growing, production, and harvesting techniques. FDA has the discretion to limit produce safety standards for small and very small entities that produce or harvest food which pose little or no serious risk to human health. Consideration is also given to conservation and environmental standards already established by federal natural resource and wildlife agencies. Exemptions are also available for low risk commodities. FDA must minimize the burden of paperwork and, as appropriate, the number of separate standards for separate foods.
Increased Training Opportunities
The bill requires FDA to coordinate with the extension activities of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture in educating growers and small processors about any new practices required by S. 510. Necessary funds are authorized to conduct these extension activities. The bill also provides for the training and education of state, local, and tribal authorities to facilitate the implementation of new standards under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. Competitive grants are made available, for up to 3 years, to support these efforts to enhance education, training, and technical assistance.
Risk-Based Traceability
The ability to trace back potentially unsafe food in the event of a food-borne illness outbreak is important. For the purpose of traceability, farms and small businesses that are not food facilities are not expected to create new records. During an active investigation of a foodborne illness outbreak, in consultation with state and local officials, the Secretary may ask a farm to identify potential immediate recipients of food if it is necessary to protect public health or mitigate a foodborne illness outbreak. Limitations are also included for restaurants, commingled agricultural commodities, direct to consumer sales, fishing vessels and products carrying an identity preserved label.
Regulatory Flexibility for Organic Foods
Throughout the bill, consideration is given to the unique agricultural practices and requirements of organic foods under the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990.
Protections for Farmers Markets, Cottage Industries and Direct Farm-to-Market Sales
Small entities that produce food for their own consumption or market the majority of their food directly to consumers or restaurants are not subject to registration or new recordkeeping requirements under S. 510. This includes food sold through farmers' markets, bake sales, public events and organizational fundraisers.
Full post as published by Marler Blog on August 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Firestone Tire Problems Raise Questions of Safety
Are Your Car Tires Safe?
Pet Food Recall and Deaths
Dogs and Cats Sickened by Tainted Menu Food Products
Pet Food Recall
Diamond Pet Food sets up $3.1 million class action fund for substandard dog food.
Food/Supplements
involving food poisoning, food product recalls, false advertising or labeling, vitamin, weight loss and diet supplement issues.
Pork BBQ Products Recalled
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct 20 that the Murphy House in Louisburg, N...
PETCO
Animal Food Distribution Unsanitary, Food Seized
Menu Food
$240,000 settlement reached in Hawaii class action contaminated pet food suit.
Safety Violations
Murphy Oil USA Inc. to pay $179,100 settlement in occupational safety violations lawsuit.

The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009: HR 875
Citizen civil actions under HR 875 (Food Safety Modernization Act)
New GAO Reports: DOD Business Systems Modernization, Contracting Strategies, Food Safety
The Rise of the Small Entity Compliance Guide
SEC Publishes Small Entity Compliance Guide
Public Health Opposition to Tester Amendment









