ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

NYSE Will Seek to Amend Rule 452 in Light of Dodd-Frank Provision

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, in Section 957, requires each national securities exchange to amend its rules to prohibit member organizations from voting shares without specific client instructions on matters related to executive compensation. The Act also includes similar provisions that prohibit voting of uninstructed shares by member organizations in the election of directors, excluding companies registered under the Investment Company Act, and in other matters as determined by the SEC. In an August 4, 2010 letter to members, the NYSE said that it intends to file an amendment to NYSE Rule 452 to prohibit members from voting uninstructed shares if the matter to be voted on relates to executive compensation, including say-on-pay proposals, at meetings occurring after July 21, 2010.

An exception will be made for those meetings on which the NYSE has issued a ``may vote? ruling prior to July 21. For proposals that are included on proxy statements that involving executive compensation matters for which member organizations had previously been allowed to vote uninstructed shares, the NYSE will treat these matters as "may not vote" rulings going forward effective immediately. Since the Act also authorizers the SEC to require other changes to NYSE Rule 452, other amendments.

On July 1, 2009, the SEC approved an NYSE amendment to Rule 452 eliminating broker discretionary voting for all elections of directors, whether contested or not. Previously, Rule 452 permitted brokers to vote on behalf of their beneficial owner customers in uncontested elections of directors if the customers had not returned voting instructions. Release No. 34-60215.

According to the Commission, the NYSE?s change was designed to enhance corporate governance and accountability by helping assure that investors with an economic interest in the company vote on the election of directors. It also addresses concerns that broker discretionary voting for directors has impacted election results. Specifically, the NYSE change adds the election of directors to the list of enumerated items for which a member generally may not give a proxy to vote without instructions from the beneficial owner. The change contains a specific exception for companies registered under the Investment Company Act.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on August 09, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0133 secs (new cache)