ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> State Courts Blogs -> Law Library Letter

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

State Courts

: Law Library Letter

Summary 2010 WY 111

ADVERTISEMENTS
Summary of Decision issued August 5, 2010

Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.

Case Name: Zumberge v. State

Citation: 2010 WY 111

Docket Number: S-09-0255

Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, the Honorable John G. Fenn, Judge.

Representing Zumberge: Michael Reese, Contract Appellate Counsel, of Michael Henry Reese, PC; Diane Lozano, Wyoming Public Defender; Tina N. Kerin, Appellate Counsel.

Representing State: Bruce A. Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Leda M. Pojman, Senior Assistant Attorney General.

Facts/Discussion: Zumberge appealed his conviction for felony driving while under the influence, alleging that his constitutional rights to due process of law and to confront witnesses were violated by the district court?s failure to reasonably accommodate his hearing impairment at trial. Under the Wyoming and federal constitutions, a clear and unequivocal rule of law exists requiring a court to make reasonable accommodations to ensure that a hearing impaired individual can hear and properly participate in the proceedings. It was not until sentencing that Zumberge notified the district court that he had had significant trouble hearing during voir dire and during his trial, and that the means adopted by the district court to prevent that problem were inadequate. The Court noted in their review of the record that the district court had informed Zumberge several times that if he had trouble hearing, he needed to make the court aware of it. The record showed the accommodations made by the district court were reasonable and adequate.

Conclusion: The district court did not abuse its discretion when evaluating Zumberge?s hearing impairment and making accommodations to ensure that he could hear the proceedings.

Affirmed.

J. Voigt delivered the decision.

Link: http://tinyurl.com/2c7gs72 .

[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. Please note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you pinpoint cite to a quote, you should cite to this paragraph number rather than to any page number. If you need assistance using the Universal Citation format, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]

Full post as published by Law Library Letter on August 05, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0037 secs (from cache 11/02/26 23:53:05)