ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Safety News

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Health Law

: Food Safety News

The Controversial Seafood 'Sniff Test'

By Dan Flynn and Suzanna Schreck

ADVERTISEMENTS
The government has reported that the "sniff test" is an important part of determining whether seafood is safe to eat. Officials say that the scientists doing the sniffing are specially trained to detect the scent of both oil and dispersant. But the sniff method has been raising doubts even among those whose livelihoods depend on restoring national confidence in gulf seafood.

Rusty Graybill, a fisherman in the gulf, spoke about his doubts in the government's testing methods. 
"If I put fish in a barrel of water and poured oil and Dove detergent over that, and mixed it up, would you eat that fish?" asked Graybill. "I wouldn't feed it to you or my family. I'm afraid someone's going to get sick," reported FoodManufacturing.com.
Ryan Lambert, 52, a charter fishing captain also does not think fishing should resume so quickly, calling for more data from the experts.
"I have no confidence in their testing methods," Lambert said.
Lambert and Graybill represent the views of many fishermen and consumers who are unsure about the safety of gulf seafood.
John Stein, head of the seafood safety program in the Gulf, was interviewed on NPR Tuesday.  He explained that each day the government assesses the fishing situation and decides whether or not to keep the grounds closed or decides to test the food and potentially reopen them.  When considering re-opening a fishing area federal agencies take into account a multi-faceted test. 
One of the steps of this test is indeed the controversial "sniff test", officially referred to as a "sensory analysis." He says that this test is only one part of a series of tests, including laboratory chemical analysis, all of which collaborate to accurately analyze the safety of the seafood.
Stein said of the controversial test, "This test is not something unique to this oil spill situation. It is a method that is used widely throughout the food industry." In terms of the seafood that undergoes the test he said, "If it passes then it will be put to a chemistry test and it must pass this to be deemed safe."

In terms of getting the word out that this and other mandatory tests do indeed insure the safety of the food, "You always can do more," Stein said.
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal called on BP Monday to fund a 20-year testing and certification program to restore confidence in seafood from the Gulf.

Full post as published by Food Safety News on August 05, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0025 secs (from cache 11/02/26 09:11:45)