Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense LawyersU.S. v. Messino, No. 02-1411 (7th Cir. August 31, 2004)
By Tom Lincoln
ADVERTISEMENTS
In a follow-up to Booker, the 7th Circuit issued today its opinion in
U.S.
v. Messino, No. 02-1411 (7th Cir. August 31, 2004). The Court's opinion
is written by Judge Bauer, and there is an opinion by Judge Easterbrook,
concurring in part and dissenting in part, who also dissented in
Booker. The opinion clearly establishes that Apprendi -and
thus Blakely- does not apply to criminal forfeiture counts, and that
criminal forfeiture may be established by a preponderance standard. Judge
Easterbrook's, for his part, presents an analysis of the preservation of
Blakely claims (assuming in arguendo that Blakely applies to
the guidelines) and when these should be reviewed for plain error and when for
harmless error. This was in response to the government's argument that
appellants had waived any Blakely claims.continue to full postFull post as published by Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers on August 31, 2004 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Merck to Begin Vioxx Payments in August
Richter sitzt wegen Rechtsbeugung auf der Anklagebank im LG Rostock








