Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005Around the Blogosphere - Eleventh Circuit Decision Threatens To Eliminate Federal Jurisdiction Over Most Consumer Class Actions, Undermining The Goals Of The Class Action Fairness Act
The Eleventh Circuit's decision last week in Cappuccitti v. DirecTV has already caused quite a stir aound the Blogosphere. We're going to bring you some of the commentary from other blogs over the next few days. Here's a post from the Mayer Brown site to whet your appetite:
| The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has just issued a decision that, if it is allowed to stand, will preclude federal jurisdiction over virtually all class-action lawsuits filed in, or removed to, federal courts within that circuit. In Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, Inc., the Eleventh Circuit held sua sponte that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) does not allow for jurisdiction over class actions unless the amount in controversy for at least one plaintiff (or class member) exceeds $75,000. So long as Cappucitti remains in force, federal courts in the Eleventh Circuit will lack jurisdiction over virtually all consumer class actions and similar types of employment class actions under state law, as individual plaintiffs in those actions typically have modest claims. That result would undercut the core purpose of CAFA—to ensure a federal forum for significant class actions—and could transform state courts in the Eleventh Circuit into magnet jurisdictions for class actions that (under Cappuccitti) cannot be removed. [Read the rest here.] |
Full post as published by CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on July 24, 2010 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Wal-Mart
Settles 63 Federal and State Class Actions for $640 Million
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed
Sunscreen Manufacturers Face Class Actions over Misleading Advertising
Banana Boat, Coppertone Face Class Action in Canada
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
Ford Focus
Consumer Class Action Settles for Cash Refunds
AmeriGas, Blue Rhino
Face Consumer Class Action

New CAFA Decision From Second Circuit
Sherman on the Class Action Fairness Act
New Class Action Fairness Act Decision
Federal Judicial Center Study on Effects of the Class Action Fairness Act
Eleventh Circuit Issues Important RESPA Class Action Decision









