Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> TradeMark Express: A Daily Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: TradeMark Express: A Daily BlogBy Shannon Moore
I've devoted a few posts to the subject of trademarks and clothing lines but it wasn't until I was talking with a client yesterday that I realized I had answered the what but not the why.
I was explaining to the client that submitting a picture of a t-shirt with his clothing line name on the front would not suffice as proof of use for the USPTO. He then asked me why. After getting off the phone, I realized that while I had answered him I hadn't fully addressed it here. The title of this post is the response you'd likely get from the USPTO if you submit a photo of a t-shirt with your name and/or logo displayed on the front. What does refusal on basis of ornamentation mean exactly?
"Subject matter that is merely a decorative feature does not identify and distinguish the applicant?s goods and, thus, does not function as a trademark. A decorative feature may include words, designs, slogans or other trade dress. This matter should be refused registration because it is merely ornamentation and, therefore, does not function as a trademark" Okay, let's explain that using non-legalese language. When an
For clothing, a lot of folks make the guess that submitting a picture of one of their t-shirts with the name on the front will work. And that does seem to make a lot of sense. But when it comes to trademarks, you've got to "identify and distinguish" your name to your clothing. This means that your name must be on a tag or a label that'd be attached to a garment that
Full post as published by TradeMark Express: A Daily Blog on March 18, 2008 (boomark / email).










