Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: inversecondemnationNew Book: Property Rights - Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined (2010)
By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
I recently picked up a copy of Property Rights - Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined (Bruce L. Benson, ed., Independent Institute 2010), available on-line here.
At 299 pages and with 13 entries, I haven't had a chance to read the whole thing yet. But after an initial skim, a few of the chapters stand out: Steven Eagle on Assembling Land for Urban Development - The Case for Owner Participation, Ilya Somin on The Limits of Backlash - Assessing the Political Response to Kelo, and Scott Bullock on The Inadequacy of the Planning Process for Protecting Property Owners From the Abuse of Eminent Domain for Private Development.
We will post more as we get further into the book, but for now, here's the publisher's summary:
The U.S. Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. New London, has become a dramatic focal point for the broad use of eminent domain by the government, and has resulted in a widespread backlash. State legislatures all over the country have responded to the backlash by considering, and often attempting to impose, new constraints on the ability of local governments to take property from one private party and transfer it to another. There has also been a revival of academic interest in the issues of eminent domain and of takings. Property Rights explores the uses and abuses of eminent domain and regulatory takings in four areas: proposed constraints on the use of eminent domain, compensation issues in theory and practice, eminent domain from a public choice perspective, and the spillover costs of takings. This comprehensive book brings together a diverse group of scholars and experts to explain the implications of this decision. Contributors include the attorney who represented Susette Kelo before the U.S. Supreme Court, the legal scholar who wrote Regulatory Takings, and experts on land value determination, land-use policy, environmental regulation, regulatory policy, entrepreneurial activities, and economic behavior.Worth reading.
Full post as published by inversecondemnation on July 20, 2010 (boomark / email).
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Eminent Domain
University of Akron pays property owner $443,000 settlement.
Condo Eminent Domain
Maui pays $4.1 million settlement to property owner.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.
Downtown Improvement
Springfield to pay more than $2.5 million settlement in eminent domain lawsuit.
Landfill Eminent Domain
Surry County pays $800,000 settlement to purchase farm land for town dump.
Stadium Eminent Domain
City of Arlington agrees to $2 million Dallas Cowboys stadium settlement.

Patashnik on Physical Takings, Regulatory Takings, and Water Rights
Epstein Revisits Property Rights in New Book
McFarlane on Eminent Domain and Redevelopment
Mahoney on the Tension Between Positive and Negative Rights in Eminent Domain
Using Eminent Domain to Take Wind Rights







