Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Bankruptcy Law Network
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bankruptcy
: Bankruptcy Law NetworkCourt Rules That Private Employers May Refuse To Hire Based Upon Bankruptcy Filing
By Craig Andresen, Minnesota Bankruptcy Attorney
In Rea v. Federated Investors, 2010 WL 370334 (W.D.Penn. Jan. 29, 2010), a U.S. district court held that section 525(b) of the bankruptcy code does not forbid a private employer from refusing to hire a job applicant solely because the job applicant filed for bankruptcy in the past. The court stated that while section 525(b) does indeed prevent employers from discriminating against current employees based upon a bankruptcy filing, the unique wording of this section allows bankruptcy discrimination in the hiring process.
The debtor had filed bankruptcy in 2002, and received a discharge of debts in that case. In 2009, the debtor interviewed for the position of project manager with Federated Investors. The debtor was informed that Federated wanted to hire him at $80,000 per year, starting in about two weeks, but that he had to pass a criminal background and credit check. After a few days, the debtor was informed that the fact of his past bankruptcy was a “deal breaker” and that he would not be hired after all. The debtor sued, claiming that this bankruptcy discrimination was unlawful under section 525(b). He asked for damages for lost wages and emotional distress.
The U.S. district court dismissed the debtor’s claims, observing that section 525(a) addresses governmental employers, and that section 525(b) addresses private employers. Section 525(a) and (b) read as follows:
(a) Except as provided in the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, and section 1 of the Act entitled ?An Act making appropriations for the Department of Agriculture for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1944, and for other purposes,? approved July 12, 1943, a governmental unit may not deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a license, permit, charter, franchise, or other similar grant to, condition such a grant to, discriminate with respect to such a grant against, deny employment to, terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against, a person that is or has been a debtor under this title or a bankrupt or a debtor under the Bankruptcy Act, or another person with whom such bankrupt or debtor has been associated, solely because such bankrupt or debtor is or has been a debtor under this title or a bankrupt or debtor under the Bankruptcy Act, has been insolvent before the commencement of the case under this title, or during the case but before the debtor is granted or denied a discharge, or has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in the case under this title or that was discharged under the Bankruptcy Act.
(b) No private employer may terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against, an individual who is or has been a debtor under this title, a debtor or bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act, or an individual associated with such debtor or bankrupt, solely because such debtor or bankrupt? (1) is or has been a debtor under this title or a debtor or bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act; (2) has been insolvent before the commencement of a case under this title or during the case but before the grant or denial of a discharge; or (3) has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in a case under this title or that was discharged under the Bankruptcy Act.
The court noted that section 525(a) forbids a governmental employer from denying employment based upon bankruptcy, while section 525(b) forbids a private employer from terminating employment or discriminating in employment based on bankruptcy. The phrase “deny employment to” was found in section 525(a) but not in section 525(b). The court found that Congress must have had a reason for omitting this phrase from section 525(b). Accordingly, it held that private employers were allowed to discriminate in hiring based upon bankruptcy, and the debtor’s discrimination case was dismissed.
Full post as published by Bankruptcy Law Network on July 14, 2010 (boomark / email).
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Private Investigators and Detectives
Services Provided by Private Investigators
How to Stop Home Foreclosure
Bankruptcy can Stop Foreclosure
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Bankruptcy Law
A complete prime (pre-2005)
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Air Line Bankruptcy
BCI Aircraft Leasing agrees to pay $600,000 settlement related to Delta Air Lines bankruptcy claims.
Bankruptcy Reorganization
Calpine Corp. pays $2.13 million bankruptcy settlement.
US Government
alleging land surveyors should not be allowed on private property to build a US Mexican border wall.
Utilities Whistleblower
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities agrees to $485,000 fine for setting up a private bank account.
Search Engine Optimization Claims
Web based company pays over $150,000 settlement in Internet lawsuit.

Court Rules That Private Employers May Refuse To Hire Based Upon Bankruptcy Filing
Protecting debtors from failure to hire, promote or termination after filing bankruptcy
Fired Because of Bankruptcy Filing, Court Denies Relief
5 Things Your Creditors Dont Want You To Know About Bankruptcy!
What Happens If I Inherit Money After Filing Bankruptcy
How Can Filing Bankruptcy Impact My Children








