Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> Indiana Consumer Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: Indiana Consumer Lawyer BlogIndiana Consumers Should Put Debt Collectors To Their Proof
By Robert Duff, Esq.
You just received a telephone call from a debt collector. The debt collector was mean and nasty and threatening and you don't know what to do. First, relax.
Then wait. The debt collector has five days (from the initial communication) to send you a letter with this information:
(1) the amount of the debt;
(2) the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed;
(3) a statement that unless the consumer, within thirty days after receipt of the notice, disputes the validity of the debt, or any portion thereof, the debt will be assumed to be valid by the debt collector;
(4) a statement that if the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, the debt collector will obtain verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment against the consumer and a copy of such verification or judgment will be mailed to the consumer by the debt collector; and
(5) a statement that, upon the consumer's written request within the thirty-day period, the debt collector will provide the consumer with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor.
If the debt collector doesn't send you a letter within five days, or the letter doesn't contain this information, that's a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Contact The Law Office of Robert E. Duff!
When you receive the required letter, and you find it contains all the information it is supposed to, your next step is to dispute the debt. This must be done within 30 days of receipt of the letter. You should ALWAYS dispute the debt. Even if you recognize the debt, even if you know you owe it, even if you feel a moral obligation to pay it, you should still dispute the debt. Disputing the debt doesn't mean that you are saying the debt isn't yours. It is simply requiring the debt collector to provide verification to you that the debt is yours. This is information that the debt collector is required to have by law in order to collect the debt, and so it should be very easy for them to provide it to you. Unfortunately, especially with older debt, the debt collector will not take the time or expense to either obtain this information or to respond to your letter, in which case by law they must cease all debt collection efforts.
What does this dispute letter look like? It's very simple. Click here to see a sample letter.
If you've looked up debt collection issues on the web, you've probably seen Bud Hibbs' website. It's a great website. It's got a lot of great information on the sometimes ugly industry of debt collection. I visit it occasionally and receive valuable information there. I have to respectfully disagree with Mr. Hibbs, however, when it comes to the content of the dispute letter.
You can see Mr. Hibbs' "Cease Communication Letter" here.
It is, as he correctly terms it, a cease communication letter under 15 U.S.C. sec. 1692c, not a dispute letter under 15 U.S.C. sec. 1692g. He says it needs to be sent within 30 days from the debt collector's letter, but as I read the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, I disagree. The dispute letter has to be sent within 30 days, but there is no such requirement for the cease communication letter. The cease communication letter can be sent at any time.
The dispute letter puts additional burdens on a debt collector (and verification is a prerequisite to a lawsuit, whereas the cease communication will not prevent the debt collector from filing a lawsuit), and I think it should be sent first. If the debt collector indeed verifies the debt, then there is a place for the cease communication letter at that time. It may result in the debt collector filing a lawsuit against you, but then again it may not.
Full post as published by Indiana Consumer Lawyer Blog on May 27, 2007 (boomark / email).
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act
Phantom Income Relief on Debt Cancellation
Collection Agencies and Creditors
How to deal and stop the harassment
Bankruptcy Law
A complete prime (pre-2005)
The Paulson Toxic Mortgage Debt Security Act: The Biggest Government Bailout of All Time
Legislative Proprosal for Treasury Authority to Purchase Mortgage-related Assets
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
Bailout Bill HR124
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Creditor Debt
Trophy Resources agrees to $600,000 debt settlement.
Bankruptcy
helping to get you out of debt.
DirecTV
alleging a cancellation fee that is improperly or insufficiently disclosed to consumers.
Antitrust
Price Fixing Could Cost Consumers up to $300 Billion Annually
Mel Harris and Associates Debt Collection
Face Class Action for Alleged "Sewer Service" Practices
AireSurf Networks Holdings Inc.
$23,147 debt settlement made by issuance of 115,735 common shares.

Fake Debt Collectors Terrify Consumers
Burden Of Proof When Debt Collectors Sue
Suing Debt Collectors Instead Of Filing Bankruptcy
What Do Collection Agencies Want From Alabama Consumers
Countersuits are acceptable losses for debt collectors
Debt collectors in the US may not be so bad, after all








